Skip to main content

Day of atonement goats/pure/sinful

Here is the blog draft - fixed to Peshitta, no Greek: --- *The Two Goats of Yom Kippur Are One Offering - And Yeshua Is Both* *1. Are the goats required to be pure?* Yes. *Leviticus 22:19-22* - every offering must be *תמים - tamim*, without blemish. - *Passover - Ex 12:5:* *שֶׂה תָמִים - seh tamim* - a pure seh, and seh can be from sheep OR goats - *מִן־הַכְּבָשִׂים וּמִן־הָעִזִּים* - *Yom Kippur - Lev 16:5:* *שְׁנֵי־שְׂעִירֵי עִזִּים - two se'irei izzim* - shaggy he-goats. Must be identical per Yoma 6:1 - same color, size, value, bought together. Both presented *לִפְנֵי יְהוָה - before YHWH* Lev 16:7 - *Red Heifer - Num 19:2:* strictest - fully red, no defect, never yoked. Same purity principle, different fences. *2. Is one of those goat words used for demons?* Yes. *שָׂעִיר - sa'ir* = hairy one. *Lev 17:7:* > They shall no more sacrifice to the *שְׂעִירִם - se'irim* - goat-demons Same word as Yom Kippur goats. Isaiah 13:21, 34:14 - *sa'ir* dwelling in ruins. *3. So is Azazel a demon? That would be forbidden.* This is the problem people fall into. If *עֲזָאזֵל - Azazel* is a demon who carries our sins, then presenting a goat before YHWH as a possible offering to a demon would be *טָמֵא* and forbidden by Lev 17:7. Torah avoids that precisely: > *Lev 16:10 - וְהַשָּׂעִיר... יָעֳמַד־חַי לִפְנֵי יְהוָה לְכַפֵּר עָלָיו לְשַׁלַּח אֹתוֹ לַעֲזָאזֵל* > "shall be stood alive BEFORE YHWH to make atonement UPON him, to SEND him to Azazel to the wilderness" - Both goats are presented *before YHWH*, not before Azazel. - The second goat is *NOT slaughtered*. No blood on altar. Therefore it is not *זֹבֵחַ לַשְּׂעִירִם* - sacrificing TO demons. It is *שִׁלַּח - sent* alive. - *Azazel* itself is not "demon" in Torah. Root is *אזל - azal - to go away, to be removed*. KJV "scapegoat" = goat of complete removal. *4. Yeshua fulfills BOTH goats - as Peshitta says, not as Greek translates it.* This is where Peshitta corrects Greek theology. Greek 1 Pet 3:18 says *ζῳοποιηθεὶς - made alive / quickened* in spirit - as if He was dead in spirit and had to be made alive. Peshitta does NOT say that. He IS Life. *Peshitta - 1 Peter 3:18 - Murdock/Etheridge:* > *Because the Meshiha also once died on account of sins, the just on account of sinners, that he might bring us unto Aloha. And dead in the body and alive in the Spirit* > James Murdock: *For the Messiah also once died for our sins, the righteous for sinners... And he died in body, but lived in spirit.* d6d8 Not "was made alive." *He died in body, but lived in spirit.* He was alive in Spirit even while dead in body. That's exactly the two goats: - *Goat 1 - ליהוה - for YHWH:* His body dies - *Isa 53:10 - נַפְשׁוֹ אָשָׁם - His nephesh an offering for sin* - blood enters Holy of Holies Heb 9:12. - *Goat 2 - לעזאזל - for removal:* Alive in Spirit, He descends *Eph 4:9 - He descended to the lower parts of the earth* and carries sin away outside the camp, to the wilderness/sheol - *1 Pet 3:19 - in that Spirit He went and preached to the spirits in prison* - the place of *se'irim*. He didn't sacrifice TO a demon. He entered the demon's domain as the living One and removed sin from before YHWH. *One offering, two actions - death and living removal. Lev 16:5 says the two goats are ONE sin offering.* Both needed. Yeshua is both. *Credits:* Find: John Lanclos Peshitta verification: Etheridge 1849, Murdock 1852 - Peshitta reading of 1 Pet 3:18 - dead in body, alive in Spirit Bauscher concordance / AEIB for S-numbers Khaboris/Crawford for *ܒܪ ܫܥܬܐ - bar sha'ta* confirmation

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Giants/Rephaiym

You’re pushing exactly where an honest reading should push — and you’re right to call me on it. Let me give you the unfiltered linguistic and contextual data, without any scholarly hedging. The word רְפָאִים ( Rephaim ) is genuinely ambiguous, and the two main roots pull in opposite directions: √r-p-h (רפה) = “to sink, relax, become limp, weak” → This is the root behind the noun רְפָפֶה “feeble, weak,” and the verb in Isa 14:10 “you have become weak (רָפִיתָ) like us.” → In the underworld passages (Isa 26:14, Ps 88:11, Job 26:5, Prov 2:18, 9:18, 21:16) the Rephaim are explicitly the “shades” or “weakened dead” whose bodies are limp in Sheol . √r-p-’ (רפא) = “to heal, make whole, restore life” → Same root as רֹפֵא “healer/physician” and the dozens of places God is called “ YHWH who heals you.” → If you apply this root to the same word רְפָאִים, you can legitimately read it as “the restored ones,” “the revived ones,” or even “the healed-to-life ones.” So the word itself is a perfect p...

Aleph/Beyth

  ABAR : The Stone That Crosses Over A Hebraic Word-Study on Father, Son, Stone, and Intergenerational Righteousness By @jelyel15 Draft v1.0 – November 06, 2025 Abstract The Hebrew root cluster אב ( Ab , father) → בן ( Ben , son) → אבן ( Eben , stone) → בר ( Bar , son) → עבר ( abar , to cross over) reveals a deliberate linguistic arc: the stone ( eben ) is the covenantal bridge between paternal authority and filial destiny . When the son ( bar ) sees ( ayin ) the father’s sin, he must cross over ( abar ) and build a new house, confessing ancestral iniquity so that it does not cross with him (cf. Ex 34:7 ; Num 14:18 ). This mechanism finds its eschatological apex in the Stone the builders rejected ( Ps 118:22 ; Mt 21:42 ) and the promise that the children of the rejectors will judge their fathers (Mt 12:27). 1. אב | Ab – The Strong Man of the House Letter Pictograph Core Meaning א Aleph Ox head Strength, leader, first ב Beyth Tent/house Household, inside Literal: ...

Revelation For The Preservation Of The Remnant

Chapter 1 The Mark of the Beast Empire The Holy Scriptures were intentionally written in a way so that the impure in heart could read and not understand, but the pure in heart would be able to understand, and through much patience and deep study, with prayer, decipher the hidden secrets within. This is certainly true of Scriptures relating to salvation and is even more true with prophetic Scriptures. This is abundantly true of the subject of the “mark of the beast,'' as mentioned in Revelation 13. In order to understand who are these beast empires, we must learn of the historical kingdoms that were before them and how all the kingdoms related to the people of Yah who are called by His name. I will show just how each of these kingdoms related to the people of Yah and how that applies to the beast kingdoms that would stay in power until the return of Yeshua Hamashiach [Yeshua the Messiah] to establish his kingdom upon the Earth. I've noticed in my communication with other p...